divulged dilemma

If the past is the past and the past is best left alone as the past and ye the past helps create the present, how can the past be left alone in the past and why does the present need the past? Frankly, sometimes I wonder about all that, you know! This seem like an obviously observation and still I perceive it is loaded with hypnological hyperbolism that makes rational thinking ironic.

Can the conscious or even unconscious self function independent of the events that the universe has archived. Can present function irrespective of the consequences of the past? The rearrangement of my personal encyclopedia of concept senses that the present is nothing more than the sum of the past shuffled and re-presented. So is the present always present and is the past ever past?

I am amused and awed buy this amazing argument intelligently presented by the mind. My body is responding in agreement with mind and, soul is sharing its silent validation of the intellectual brilliance that my mind is capable of expressing. Mind is accepting its grandeur like a renowned genius. Stating its subjective inquiries directly to omniscientience and receiving respectful acknowledgement is constantly increasing its willingness to examine, re-examine and rearrange the content of its faculty